 |
Ever been called a Neocon? Sure you have! If you've ever taken an exotic safari into the jungle that is Media Matters for America or, if you are really daring, Democrats.org, you have been called a neo-conservative. The very term sends fear down a liberals' spine: Neeeooooccooooooonnn! Don't know about you, but I am sick and tired of being ashamed to be a neocon. I'm a neocon and I'm proud of it.
This website will hopefully serve as an HQ for all the ammunition any neocon could ever ask for. Proudly wear the tag of neocon!
Discuss anything political here!
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Dec 10, 2005
Nigerian Plane Crashes, Killing Many Passengers
From the AP:
LAGOS, Nigeria (AP) -- A Nigerian passenger jet crashed on landing at the airport in the southern city of Port Harcourt on Saturday, a civil aviation official said. At least 56 people were killed, reports said.
So far, the cause is "unclear," though I doubt it is terrorism, due to the fact that this just recently happened in Nigeria and the U.S. ruled our terrorism (for more info on that, click the link.)
I may post more on this as updates come in.
Posted at 09:02 am by NeoConCentral
Permalink
Dec 9, 2005
"Cultue of Cronyism"? Sure--In The Democratic Party
Today, governor-elect Jon Corzine appointed Rep. Robert Menendez to take his soon-to-be-empty Senate seat for the remaining year. Via AP:
Gov.-elect Jon Corzine on Friday appointed Democratic Rep. Robert Menendez to serve out the remaining year in Corzine's Senate term, giving New Jersey its first minority senator.
So the Democrats decided to replace a corrupt Democrat with a realy corrupt Democrat.
Here comes a long, long story. And it starts with allegations of an affair...
In 2004, Menendez called for the embattled then-Governor of N.J. Jim McGreevey to resign from his post.. In response, McGreevey supporters threatened to tell the public that Menendez was involved in an affair with a woman named Kay Elizabeth LiCausi.
LiCausi was a staffer for Menendez. In 2002, she left and started a business called K.L. Strategies. The company only consisted of two people. But K.L. Strategies quickly launched into success. Why?
Well, it may have had something to do with the large sums of money that Menendez began funnelling to her new business. Menendez's Political Action Committee, New Millenium PAC, paid K.L. Strategies $45,000 in media consulting fees between January and September, 2003. The New York Times reported that over $200,000 was forked over from Menendez to LiCausi.
Why the sudden socket to success? Obviously, Menendez lended her a ton of cash. Did he really believe she was that great? Or was it because of an affair? Menendez, recently divorced at 51, refuses to comment. "That's strictly personal," he says.
Is an investigation in order? Surely, this would be considered cronyism: handing over cash to a lover's business from your Political Action Committee.
Only time will tell us more on this issue.
Posted at 09:24 pm by NeoConCentral
Permalink
Clinton: "Precauation" Against Terrorism Less Important than "Precaution" Against Climate Change
Adding to a long tradition of lobbying for terrorists who hate America, impeached former president Bill Clinton said today during a surprise speech to the Montreal meeting on climate change and global warming, to the wild applause of thousands of delegates from around the world, that holding a "precautionary" attitude towards terrorism just isn't as important as showing precaution to the more clear and present danger to America: global warming.
Via Free Internet Press
In a comment clearly directed at the Bush administration, he noted that the United States had adopted a precautionary approach to fighting terrorism. "There is no more important place in the world to apply the principal of precaution than the area of climate change," he said, generating waves of applause.
Since he made so sure to mention the U.S.'s "precautionary approach" to terrorism, apparently, "climate change" is the most important place for precaution, instead of that terrorism thing.
At least he's consistent in his support for terrorism. In 1999 during his presidency, Clinton pardoned 16 members of the FALN, a Puerto Rican nationalist terrorist organization. These terrorists had been convicted for their conspiracies to harm America and seditious behavior. The group of which they were members had killed American civilians in the past.
But Clinton went ahead and pardoned them. Subsequently, the Fraternal Order of Police condemnedthe pardons. The House of Representatives voted to condemnthe pardons by 311-41. The Senate voted to condemnthe pardons with only two radicals voting NAY. Only fellow insane Democratic terrorist allies seemed to fail to condemn the pardons.
One has to wonder if terrorism doesn't even come in second place when it comes to the many areas in which the government needs to take "precautionary" action...
Posted at 07:34 pm by NeoConCentral
Permalink
Dec 7, 2005
From now on, periodically, I'll be posting little items pointing out lies I hear on the left's beloved radio network, Air America.
This one comes from the Queen of Mean, Randi Rhodes. I would call Rhodes the Ann Coulter of the right, but, Rhodes makes Coulter look like a gentle little lamb.
Anyway, Rhodes made at least one false statement on her program on Dec. 6. All I really did was skip to a part in the soundbite and there it was. Rhodes said that we have a "President who declared the war is over when it wasn't over." Don't believe me? See for yourself (it'll be hard to find though): http://www.airamericaplace.com/upload/aarr120505.mp3
Anyway, the truth is that Bush never said the war was over, He declared an end to major combat operations, but in fact stated that the course would take some time. From his speech aboard an aircraft carrier on May 1, 2003 when he said this:
We have difficult work to do in Iraq. We're bringing order to parts of that country that remain dangerous. We're pursuing and finding leaders of the old regime, who will be held to account for their crimes.
[...]
The transition from dictatorship to democracy will take time, but it is worth every effort. Our coalition will stay until our work is done. Then we will leave, and we will leave behind a free Iraq.
Funny that, from a radio network that almost daily refers to conservative talk radio hosts as "liars,"
we have, well.... a liar....
More to come in the future...
Posted at 08:07 pm by NeoConCentral
Permalink
Nov 22, 2005
Liberal Idiots Promote Idea that "White Phosphorus" is a WMD
It certainly has been a huge story. Liberals are so happy to find that the U.S. was using "WMD"'s, proving once and for all that the U.S. is more evil that any other country, no matter what we do.
From a Daily Kos-er, commenting on one of the countless Kos posts about WP:
...when you think about the fact the administration took our country to war over WMD, and the only WMD turns out to be our own
Only one problem: white phosphorus isn't a WMD. Wikipedia says:
Use of white phosphorus against military targets (and outside civilian areas) is not specifically banned by any treaty. However, there is a debate on whether white phosphorus is a chemical weapon and thus outlawed by the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) which went into effect in April of 1997. The CWC is monitored by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. The spokesman for that organization, Peter Kaiser, stated that the use of white phosphorus was not prohibited under the convention if it was used for " (m)ilitary purposes not connected with the use of chemical weapons and not dependent on the use of the toxic properties of chemicals as a method of warfare"(Chemical Weapons Convention, Article II, Definitions, 9, "Purposes not Prohibited" c.)). The Chemical Weapons Convention specifically defines a "toxic chemical" as a chemical "which through its chemical action on life processes can cause death, temporary incapacitation or permanent harm to humans or animals".(CWC, II). Following that definition, the convention defines chemical weapons as "(t)oxic chemicals and their precursors, except where intended for purposes not prohibited under this Convention, as long as the types and quantities are consistent with such purposes". Strictly speaking, since white phosphorus's primary effects are not actually due to its toxicity, but its spontaneous ignition in the presence of oxygen, many believe it has more in common with incendiary weapons instead. [4]
Doesn't sound much like a WMD to me...
Posted at 12:35 pm by NeoConCentral
Permalink
Daily Mirror: Bush Targeted Al-Jazeera
Bush wanted to blow up Al-Jazeera, the British press is reporting.
The unfortunate part is that administration officials are denying the charge.
From DiscoverTheNetwork:
Arabic television station and satellite network launched in 1996, funded by Emir of Qatar
Known as the "CNN of the Arab world" and "Jihad TV," it claims to have 50 million viewers
9-11 terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden's outlet for video messages
Its Spanish reporter was arrested for terrorist ties to bin Laden's Al Qaeda
At least two of its Iraqi reporters and one executive had secret connections with, and apparently worked for, Saddam Hussein's intelligence service
Praised Democratic candidate John Kerry and did positive reporting from 2004 Democratic National Convention
Gave airtime to racist David Duke to claim that Jews knew in advance of 9-11 attack on World Trade Center and stayed away
Described Islamist suicide-homocide bombers in Israel as "martyrs"
What would be wrong with attacking an anti-American propaganda-mouthpeice that feeds Arab hatred of the United States?
Posted at 11:35 am by NeoConCentral
Permalink
Nov 21, 2005
This is Why We Need Another Sedition Act
Looks like Chris Matthews is yet another lurking traitor to America, reminding us that the terrorists would be there if it wasn't for the evil, evil United States...
From Matthews: "If we stop trying to figure out the other side, we've given up. The person on the other side is not evil. They just have a different perspective."
This type of logic is a clear and present threat to our national security. News media stars who promote the idea that our enemy simply has "a different perspective" should be censored from society. It should simply be illegal to spread pro-enemy propaganda during a time of war. You have the right to be against the war. You should not have the right to encourage Americans to support the enemy.
Posted at 06:17 pm by NeoConCentral
Permalink
Nov 20, 2005
Did/Does Rep. Jack Murtha Use Drugs/Have Drug Users Working for Him?
Yeah you probably laughed out loud at that. And that's cool, it was meant to be a little funny. But I'm actually being serious here:
I think Jack Murtha may either be using drugs or is hiring people who take drugs.
I have formed this hypothesis after reviewing not one, not two, but three pro-drug votes he has made during his Congressional tenure. I could be wrong, but I think it deserves some investigation. Here are the three pro-druggie votes:
1. Murtha voted NO on an "[a]mendment to set up a task force on counter-terrorism and drug interdiction and allow military personnel to help patrol U.S. borders."
2. Murtha voted NO on a bill that "prohibits the use of federal funds for needle exchange programs" and "prohibits implementing an approved ballot initiative to legalize the medicinal use of marijuana."
3. Murtha voted NO on "an amendment to require that anyone hired by the Federal Government is subject to random, unannounced drug testing."
You can read all of this at OnTheIssues.
So what is the deal with all of the pro-drug votes? I know there are Republicans that voted against these things as well but.... all three of them?
..........
Haha, I'm just joking everyone. Don't get all uptight.
Posted at 11:52 am by NeoConCentral
Permalink
Is Murtha A Pork-Barreler?
Newsbusters has got the goods on Jack Murtha and his not-so-respectable spending. Check it out here.
Posted at 09:22 am by NeoConCentral
Permalink
The Lying Liars of the Left
One particular lie/distortion that has been spreading like a wildfire since Friday's big debate has been to say that Jean Schmidt called Jack Murtha a coward. Examples...
Democratic Party blog
" Republican Congresswoman Jean Schmidt (OH-02) basically just called Congressman Murtha, a decorated Vietnam veteran and former Marine Corps drill instructor, a coward."
DCCC Blog
"In an unusual floor action, Representative Jean Schmidt today was forced to withdraw remarks she made referring to Congressman John Murtha, a highly decorated Vietnam War Veteran, as a 'coward.' "
Bareknucklepolitics
" Rep. Jean Schmidt (R) called Rep. Murtha (D) a coward..."
Ed Henry of CNN
"And, at one point, a Republican, Jean Schmidt of Ohio, basically suggested John Murtha, a wounded veteran of the Vietnam War, somebody who got two Purple Hearts, was a coward. "
Washington Post
"Differences over policy on the Iraq war ignited an explosion of angry words and personal insults on the House floor Friday, when the chamber's newest member [Schmidt] suggested that a decorated war veteran, Rep. John Murtha, D Pa., was a coward for calling for an immediate withdrawal."
On and on and on....
Actually, Jean Schmidt herself did not call him a coward. She quoted someone else:
At one point in the emotional debate, Rep. Jean Schmidt, R-Ohio, told of a phone call she received from a Marine colonel.
"He asked me to send Congress a message — stay the course. He also asked me to send Congressman Murtha a message — that cowards cut and run, Marines never do."
Though for the record: I agree completely with the statement. However valiant and brave Murtha was in Vietnam, his Iraq assessment and his current beliefs are beyond cowardly: they are traitorous.
Correction: A comment from a fellow blogger this morning pointed out that, according to a report from this morning's Cincinnati Enquirer, the Marine who Schmidt claimed to be quoting denies having told Jean to give her now-infamous "cowards" comment. This does not, however, take away from the point that,when the reports that I quoted attributed the quote to Schmidt that, at that time, it was believed that Schmidt was quoting a Marine. Now it is fair to attribute them to her. I still support the comments, even though she doesn't even support them. We should be allowed to call someone who supports the immediate withdrawal from a nation simply for political gain a "coward." I have no problem with it. In fact, just for you, Spanner, check this out: Jack Murtha is a coward! Jack Murtha is a coward! Jack Murtha is a coward! Jack Murtha is a coward! Jack Murtha is a coward! Jack Murtha is a coward! Jack Murtha is a coward! Jack Murtha is a coward! Jack Murtha is a coward! Jack Murtha is a coward! Jack Murtha is a coward! Jack Murtha is a coward! Jack Murtha is a coward! Jack Murtha is a coward! Jack Murtha is a coward! Jack Murtha is a coward! Jack Murtha is a coward! Jack Murtha is a coward!
But again, Spanner, thanks for pointing that out. You provide an invaluable service.
Posted at 08:57 am by NeoConCentral
Permalink
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|